678 VINTAGE CAMERAS
  • Store
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • About
  • Policies

Not-so-random thoughts

Tips, tricks, history, etc.

Last Man(ual Focus Minolta) Standing - The X-370

1/21/2021

12 Comments

 
Picture
The First-Gen X-370 (X-300 Outside of N. America) & Its Sable Stablemate, the X-7A

  Updated Mar. 16, 2021

    The Pentax K1000. The Minolta X-700. The Nikon F3. When it comes to naming the Japanese 35mm SLRs that remained in production the longest, those three models are at the top of most lists with both the Pentax and Nikon breaking the two-decade barrier (21 years for the Pentax and over 20 years for the Nikon to be more exact), and the Minolta clocking out after 19 years. Unsurprisingly, all three of these models are very popular with film enthusiasts today, with the Pentax and Minolta routinely being recommended as "Best Beginner Film SLR" and the Nikon being lauded as an all-time classic and sometimes espoused as the "Best 35mm SLR of All Time". The objective of this article is not to wade into any fray over "the Best..." (seeing as what's best for me or you will not necessarily be the same in any case), but rather, to introduce you to another entrant in the longest-produced sweepstakes; one that receives far less notoriety, yet can prove to be an excellent choice as an introduction to film photography.   

​  XG Origins

    The X-370 was the final link in a chain of Minolta manual focus (MF) consumer SLRs that were a direct response to the unmatched sales success of the Canon AE-1. Within a year of the AE-1’s debut in 1976, Minolta fought back with the XG-7 (XG-2 in Europe & XG-E in Japan). Coming in at two-thirds the cost of the class-leading, enthusiast-targeted XD, the XGs would serve as the template for the X-xxx series, which would terminate with the X-370. Per Minolta's wont, the XG models changed designation according to sales region (North America vs. Europe vs. Asia, in this case). They were Minolta's first hybrid-construction SLRs, featuring glass-reinforced polymers ("plastic" for the less-verbose ;-)) with an aluminum front plate & film gate and a steel plate based around the tripod mount to stiffen the entire assembly. As time went by, Minolta tweaked their design and production techniques to make the most of this modular platform. Over the eight-year interval from the original XG-7 to the X-370's introduction in 1984, 35 to 40 grams of material was shaved from the construction. Electrical circuits were also simplified over time.

  An X-xxx Series Overview

    Consolidation of their manual focus SLR lineup was one of Minolta's main goals with the X-xxx models. Instead of five or six models (made up of various XDs and XGs), there would be just three, and they would share as many parts as possible to reduce production costs. Minolta started at the top with the X-700 (introduced in late-1981), which married an XG chassis & internals to the XD's "final-check" silicon photodiode (SPD) meter and introduced Minolta's first through-the-lens (TTL) flash metering system. This slotted it between the XD and the XG-M as far as cost went. It was also the first Minolta to feature auto-exposure lock and a Program exposure mode (the camera set both shutter speed and aperture automatically), to go along with Minolta's traditional Aperture-priority (A) and Manual modes.

    Just as they had done with their previous XE, XD, and XG lines, Minolta had a slightly de-contented version of the X-700 waiting in the wings. I​n 1983, the X-570 (X-500 outside of North America) made its debut. Deleted were Program Mode and Exposure Compensation. The X-570 would make do with A and M modes. This was a very small step down, and the -570 actually added two features (versus the X-700) that made it a more versatile SLR for advanced users: 1) slow-speed flash sync (allowing for sync with shutter speeds slower than the standard 1/60 sec.), and 2) a twin-LED readout in Manual mode (a glowing LED for the meter's recommended shutter speed, and a blinking LED for the actual speed that was set on the dial). This allowed the user to keep the camera to their eye instead of having to look at the shutter speed dial to confirm the setting. ISO range was also expanded to 12 - 3200 from 25 - 1600 on the X-700.​ 
    

  An Untimely Demise for the X-570​    
​
    1984 brought the X-370 (X-300 outside of North America), rounding out Minolta's final MF SLR triumvirate. Being the base model, the feature deletions were more pronounced:
  • No DOF (depth-of-field) preview
  • No TTL flash
  • No aperture readout in the viewfinder
  • No PC (Pronto-Compur) flash socket for off-camera flash sync. via cable
  • No slow-speed warning or self-timer beeper (an "upgrade" for some)
  • No lock for "A" mode on the shutter speed dial (for some users, this also qualifies as an upgrade ;-)). The shutter speed dial is also integrated into the top plate and feels less-precise than the X-570's and X-700's
  • No rear thumb grip
  • No removable back and thus no provision for using a Data or Multi-Function Back

    The result of all of this trimming was an SLR that came in 20% cheaper than the X-570 and 40% less than the X-700. Adjusted for inflation to 2021 (as are all prices in this article), you could own an X-370 (with a 50/1.7 lens) in 1984-85 for $360 USD. Now, it's quite obvious that the X-570 had the best combination of features as far as an enthusiast was concerned. But it would suffer from middle-child syndrome, being overlooked by consumers awestruck by the blinding superiority of the X-700's Program mode ;-) or the enticingly-priced X-370. When Joe/Jolene Consumer looked through the viewfinder of all three models in the store, they all looked the same, except for that magic green "P" glowing inside the X-700 and the absence of the aperture readout in the X-370 (which they probably didn't notice anyway, unless the salesperson pointed it out :-)). And if the salesperson did point it out, they probably also pointed out the $150 USD difference between the X-700 and the -370, with the X-570 stuck in the middle. Overall sales of the three models reflected this reality. The X-570/-500 was only produced from 1983-85 and sold until early-1989 with approximately 350,000 units made versus the two-decade or more lifespans of the X-700 (1981-99 & 2.1 million sold) and the X-370 (in production until 2005, with 1.8 million sold by 1993 and millions more produced in China in OEM and licensed versions from 1987 until at least 2012).

    The X-570's main problem was that the X-370, even lacking DOF preview, TTL flash, and the aperture readout, was still a lot of camera for the money:
  • Same bright 95%/0.9x viewfinder with Acute Matte focusing screen
  • Same Silicon Photo Diode meter with 1 - 18 EV sensitivity
  • Same ISO range
  • Same shutter w/ 1/1000 - 4 sec. range in A mode and 1/1000 - 1 sec. in M mode
  • Same AE Lock and Self-Timer
  • Same Touch-Switch for the meter (on first-gen X-370/-300 models, at least)
  • Same Manual mode with twin-LED readout
  • Same build quality 
  • Same accessories (except the Quartz Data and Multi-Function Backs, which only the X-700 & X-570/500 could use) and access to the full range of Minolta MF SR lenses (aside from the ultra-rare 21/4.5 & 21/4 Auto Rokkors, which none of the Minolta SLRs lacking Mirror Lock Up - including the entire X-xxx series - could use)
   ***NOTE*** Yes (for all you X-xxxperts ;-)), there was another X-xxx model, the X-600, released to selected members of the photographic media alongside the X-570 in April 1983. Minolta described it as "experimental" and thereafter it saw very limited production for the Japanese market only. Estimates of less than 10,000 being manufactured are bandied about today. In exterior appearance, the X-600 was an amalgam of the X-570 (OFF/ON switch, TTL hot shoe, interchangeable back) and what became the X-370 (right hand controls for winding, shutter speed selection & release, and no aperture readout in the finder). Unique to the X-600 was its more prominent grip which encapsulated two AAA batteries to power the camera and its ultimate feature of an electronic rangefinder for focus confirmation. There was also a small "SF" badge below the rewind crank on the front of the camera that stood for "Speed Focus". The X-600 was never intended to occupy a place in Minolta's standard SLR lineup. It was an R&D project as Minolta advanced toward a full-on auto focus (AF) SLR. 
     
     ​1985 brought an all-black version of the X-370...the X-7A. (The international X-300 was available in both chrome and all-black finishes.) The X-7A can be easily confused with the earlier Japanese-domestic-market-only X-7 (1982), the black version of which was basically an XG-A with the addition of a slow-shutter-speed warning beeper and a removable film back. The X-7A is considerably more camera than the X-7 though they are usually priced identically nowadays (bargain alert!).

  The Slow Devolution of the X-370
​

    1985 also served as the demarcation line as far as the future of the manual focus SLR line as a whole for Minolta. With the overnight success of their Maxxum (in North America; Dynax in Europe; Alpha in Japan) AF system introduced in February of that year, Minolta began the process of slowly shuttering their quarter-century-old SR system. This started out innocuously enough: discontinuing production of the under-appreciated X-570, leaving the X-700 & X-370 to care for the now rapidly-declining MF market. Next, Minolta moved to lessen labor costs by offshoring most of X-xxx series production to Malaysia and later, China (although some were still assembled in Japan). Then, slowly squeezing the higher-end MD optics out of the lineup and actually turning to sub-contractors to design and build small & cheap zooms to go along with a few token primes by the mid-90's. It would only be the X-370, in its entry-level/student market slot, that would receive any sort of "updating" (mostly in the form of cost-cutting ;-)) in the final decade-and-a-half of the Minolta MF system. It went something like this:
  • X-370N/X-300s (1990-95) - With MF SLR market share at 15% in the USA and less than 10% in Japan, Minolta "refreshed" the look of the X-370 to something more 90's-ish (read: black plastic and rubber & more curves, including a rear thumb grip, a slightly fuller finger grip, and a ribbed bottom plate ;-)). The film memo holder was replaced by a window in the film back that displayed the ISO and frame count data imprinted on the film cartridge. They also slipped in an aperture read-out window into the viewfinder but took away a bit of magnification (0.84x vs. the 0.9x of the original) at the same time. Finally, the Touch Switch shutter release was deleted for a standard half-press version and branding was now silkscreened instead of the more labour-intensive embossing and painting of the originals.
  • X-9 (1990-95) - A slightly pumped-up X-370N, the X-9 added a DOF preview button and a diagonally-oriented split-image rangefinder focusing aid versus the standard horizontal version. At some point during 1990-95 production, Minolta deleted the remote release socket from the X-9 & X-370N that had previously lived below the lens-release button on all X-xxx bodies. 
  • X-370s (1995-2005) - After years of licensing the X-370 design (beginning in 1987) to the Shanghai General Camera Factory (commonly referred to as Seagull, their longest-lived brand name) for both Chinese domestic and export sales, Minolta began subcontracting all X-370 production to SGCF in 1995. This was signified by the change to the X-370s moniker. Aside from the X-370s logo on the right front shoulder of the camera (as held in shooting position) it is distinguishable by a return to a leatherette front covering that covers even the finger grip. The back remains pure X-370N, with thumb grip, et al. But, the top & bottom plates and controls hearken back to the first-generation X-370, with the Touch Switch shutter release, and remote release socket returning, as well. The X-370s was available new until 2005 at B&H and other retailers, but SGCF kept the basic design in production under a variety of other brand names & models (Carena, Centon, Kalimar, Phoenix, Revue, Seagull, Soligor, Texer, and Vivitar, just to mention a few) into the 20-teens for sure. 
Picture
Are you an Original Series or Next Generation type of person? ;-)

  Life With an X-370 Series Minolta Today

  While a base-model in every sense, the X-370 acquitted itself well among its contemporaries such as the Olympus OM G (OM-20), Nikon FG-20, Pentax P-3, and even older higher-level models that were being lumped into the same price bracket by 1985, such as the Yashica FX-D. The -370 totally out-classed the identically-priced Canon T50, which was really a poor SLR version of a point-and-shoot (you still had to manually focus and rewind the film, while having no opportunity to take control of exposure as you gained experience). The Olympus competed well based on features, especially the viewfinder (93% @ 0.92x), but definitely feels less-solid; the Nikon matches the feel and capability of the X-370 (and throws in a better vertical-travel shutter), but the somewhat dimmer viewfinder (92% @ 0.86x) lags a bit behind; the Pentax (another overlooked, but very capable camera) feels as solid and maybe even a bit more so than the Minolta, but the viewfinder (92% @ 0.82x) is a step down.  

    Today, an X-370/X-7A/X-9 will easily run you a third to a quarter of the cost of an equivalent-condition X-700 from a reputable used camera dealer. That makes it a veritable steal in my books. While undeniably lesser in features, its build quality is equivalent and the guts of both cameras are essentially identical. With the elimination of the Program and TTL flash modes came simplification of the X-370's internal circuitry, with 25 connections requiring de-soldering for a complete teardown versus 37 in the X-700. That relative simplicity makes the X-370 easier to repair, particularly when it comes to the most common malady afflicting the X-xxx series SLRs: the dreaded failure of the mirror-release capacitor. Easily-accessed in the bottom of the X-370, you are looking at a 10 to 15 minute DIY repair with modest soldering skills on the X-370, while the X-700 requires removal of the top plate, ISO controls, and more to access its mirror-release capacitor...a much more laborious and time-consuming process. ***NOTE*** You may as well replace the aperture-control capacitor on the X-700 while you are at it (it triggers two separate diaphragm-control electromagnets prior to the triggering of the mirror release magnet). It is found in the same location in the bottom of the X-700 as the X-370's mirror release capacitor.

    Another tidbit concerns replacement of the focusing screen. Although Minolta did not draw attention to it in the instruction manual for the X-370, the focusing screen was identical to X-700's & X-570's. The various dealer-interchangeable screens for the X-700 are rare to find nowadays, but they will fit the X-370 just fine or you can use the standard X-700 screen to replace a scratched or otherwise damaged X-370 screen or vice-versa. Again, with care (focusing screens are very easily scratched if you are not careful), a good set of self-closing tweezers, and a fine pick, it is a 3 to 5 minute job to remove, blow any dust off of, and replace the focusing screen on any X-xxx series camera.

    Sure, the X-370/X-7A is far from the pinnacle of 35mm film SLRs...but for the money, you get an awful lot of camera. The viewfinder is one of the best of any non-professional SLR of the era, and with Minolta's Acute Matte focusing screen technology, it is a bright and snappy focuser. Film winding, while certainly not being mistaken for that of an XD or XE, is also snappy and plenty smooth. All-in-all, I find that the X-370 doesn't get in the way much, if at all, of my photographic intentions. It's simple, lightweight, and solid enough for casual to moderate use. In other words, a great way to sample the film SLR experience for the first time, or a great backup body to any of the more-advanced Minolta MF bodies. It is an excellent gateway to the magnificent menagerie of Minolta manual focus glass available today, too. You get the option of traditional styling with the first-generation or the swoopier second-gen models (the X-9 is the definite pick of the litter among these as far as features go). Taking its two-decade lifespan badged as a Minolta together with at least another 7 years following that in various guises from the Shanghai General Camera Factory into account, the X-370 might well lay claim to the longest production life and highest numbers of any Japanese-designed 35mm SLR. Not too shabby for a camera that became "obsolete" only a year after its introduction :-).

  References:

    Various Instruction Manuals @ https://www.butkus.org/chinon/index.html
    Popular Photography March 1982 - Lab Report XG-M p. 113    
    Popular Photography November 1982 - Lab Report X-700 p.115 
    Popular Photography April 1985 - Lab Report X-370 p. 33
    Popular Photography September 1990 - Test Report X-370N p. 54
    Minolta SLR Production Numbers @ http://knippsen.blogspot.com
    Chinese SLR Production Numbers @ http://knippsen.blogspot.com
    Minolta X-600 @ http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Minolta_X-600
    Popular Photography June 1983 - Minolta X-570 & X-600 Introduction p. 69
    Popular Photography December 1994 - Minolta X-600 SLR Column p. 38
12 Comments
Gil Aegerter
1/26/2021 11:27:46 am

Fascinating history. I've owned X-700s for years, and the only film cameras I like shooting with as much are my Nikon F2 and FE. One of my X700s is getting balky now ... an X370 ahead?

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
1/26/2021 04:49:44 pm

Thanks Gil. If you are an "A" or "M" mode shooter and TTL flash is not a concern, the X-370 (or an X-7A) is a fine alternative. It's not so much that X-700s are exorbitantly priced nowadays (a bit rich for my blood for what they are ;-)), as the -370 is underrated and thus a super value at current prices. Best regards.

Reply
Gil Aegerter link
1/25/2023 07:38:20 pm

Well, I recently ran across an X-370 at my local store, then re-read your article, and today I bit. This one appears to be in like-new condition, and it came with a 45mm lens for the princely sum of $40. I went out and shot a roll of Fujicolor 400, so we'll see what happens. But it is somewhat familiar from my X-700. And it feels way better than even a Nikon FG, a body I never did like. Thanks again for your work.

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
1/25/2023 11:11:15 pm

Congratulations on your score, Gil. Anytime you can nab the body as basically a throw-in for the cost of a lens counts as a win in my books :-). I am looking forward to hearing about your results with the 45mm as there seems to be a wide variety of opinions on its performance. Minolta was generally pretty good with their budget optics, which bill the 45/2 fits perfectly, especially with its near-pancake dimensions. I have not yet had the opportunity to try one. Best regards.

Lennart Nenne Karlsson link
3/1/2021 01:21:25 am

Hello C J Odenbach
I have read with interest about capacitor problems with some Minolta cameras. You wright that it was economic reasons to use cheaper capacitors. Was it only Minolta that was using these? I think the other producers should have used them as well on the "race to the bottom"? But I have not seen anything about similar problems with Canon, Pentax etcetera.
This is not a problem for me, because my minolta is the SR7 and there is no capacitors, but I am a lot curios on the matter. I still use the SR7 now and then and it is fully functional
Best regard
Lennart Karlsson, Sweden

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
3/1/2021 02:15:25 pm

Hi Lennart.

That is a great question. Minolta usage of capacitors to energize the mirror and aperture release magnets was unique among the Japanese SLR manufacturers, and a very simple solution. The other companies (e.g. Canon, & Pentax, etc.) used different methods to achieve the same objective. As long as Minolta used good quality components, it was not a problem. But it definitely made them more vulnerable when they decided that they would cut costs in that area. The tradeoff today is that Minoltas with the capacitor problem are generally easily repaired (the X-700 aside), whereas their competitors, while not plagued with bad capacitors in those types of circuits, can fail in other ways that are more difficult to diagnose and are not as cost-effective to repair nowadays. You take your chances with consumer electronics from that era ;-). Glad to hear that your SR7 is going strong.

Best regards.

Reply
Lennart Nenne Karlsson link
3/2/2021 01:15:30 am

Thanks a lot C J for explaining this. I took for granted it was a common technique. But there is at least one other camera using capacitors for the shutter and it is Mamiya 645 - the shutter is nicely explained in the instruction book.
It´s always very interesting to read your article about older cameras and lenses. I´m looking forward to read more from your hand
Best regards
Lennart

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
3/2/2021 07:48:35 am

Thanks for providing that clarification, Lennart. I haven't had any Mamiyas come into my hands yet, let alone a medium format one. I wouldn't be surprised if they also used the same method in some of their 35mm bodies, too. I will have to keep an eye out for that. Glad you are enjoying website. Take care.

Reply
Mariusz Ciesielski
7/27/2021 03:32:07 am

Hello!

That's a great article. In fact, whole website is a real gem - my browser has now dozen tabs opened with articles to read.

But I didn't just come here by a chance. I have two x300 with interesting issues, let me elaborate a little.

I've fallen in love with x300 in high school, as these were used in photography classes. After brief period of struggle with soviet m42 cameras i got myself an x-300 - what a viewfinder it was! In fact it still amazes me how satisfying it is to look through.

After some years my x300 (mint condition, made in Japan) (I) broke. The winding lever became completely loose. Without thinking too much I've ordered another one, slightly battered, made in Malaysia.

Years passed, and recently I've decided to have a look at x300 (I) - turned out all that was needed to fix it was to remove plastic cap atop of the winding lever (plastic broke to pieces), tighten a screw there, and it worked like new.

But the new issue surfaced recently, and that's where thing get interesting. As my interest in film photography rekindled, I played with both cameras a little. And both stopped working within an hour apart.

- I replaced batteries - nothing, no lights in the viewfinder
- I've then learned about capacitors. It would've been strange for both to fail at the virtually same time, but certainly not impossible.
I've started to look for correct replacement that would fit.

- x300 (II) started working, just like that. No problem ever since.
- I've then fiddled with x300 (I) little more and successfully revived it by unscrewing battery cap a little

I've found a post somewhere according to which sometimes when batteries voltage is too low camera won't start, and that sometimes it just fixes itself. That seemed to be the cause here, I guess.

But I've later uncovered another issue with the otherwise mint x300 (I). It appears to meter the light in quite random way: The meter would suggest 1/30 with 50/1.7 stopped to f8, while 135/2.8 stopped to the same f8 give a reading of 1/125, an that's quite a difference. The conditions were of course constant. Basically x300 (II) gives the same readings regardless of the lens (readings that are correct, checked with my other cameras), while readings of x300 (I) vary depending on the lens. This puzzles me a lot.

Did any of you have similar issue with X-xxx family camera? Maybe it's something easy to fix..

Thanks, Mariusz

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
7/27/2021 01:55:14 pm

Hi Mariusz. Glad you are enjoying the site and thanks for reaching out. I have not yet personally come across the problem you are describing. I am suspecting something is wrong with the meter coupling (MC) ring (the spring-loaded ring surrounding the lens mount with the tab that engages another tab on the aperture ring of the lens), or another part of the metering circuit. To start with:

1. With the 50/1.7 mounted on either X-300 with both set to the same film speed do you get the same readings (within 1/2 stop) as you move the aperture ring through the entire range of f/1.7-16?

If not, the issue is internal, whether with the metering cell itself or another portion of the meter circuit.

If the readings are consistent between both, then there must be some issue with the interface between the MC ring on the affected X-300 and your 135/2.8 lens.

2. Check the action of the MC ring as you gently push it through its travel. It should move smoothly and then spring freely back as you let it return against your finger to its rest position. Next, ensure that the lens mount screws are secure on both the body and your 135/2.8 lens and then mount the lens to ensure that the MC tab on the aperture ring of the lens is positively engaging the MC ring's tab throughout the full aperture range and does not stick at any point in its travel forward or backwards.

If this fails to produce any results, I would again suspect an internal problem.

There is a free PDF Service Manual available for the X-300/-370 and a combined one for the X-300/-370 & X-500/-570 at learncamerarepair.com if you have not already found them. I could not find anything in the troubleshooting section that directly addressed your problem, but you might find it helpful for other situations.

I can't guarantee how many times we will be able to reply back and forth in the comments section here, so if you would like to use the Contact Us section, I will always be able to reply. I hope that helps a bit, and please don't hesitate to email me back.

Best regards.

Reply
Jon C
11/30/2022 07:17:45 pm

Hello, I just wanted to thank you for a most enjoyable blog here. After spending quite a lot of time reading while at my stupid boring job, I just bought one of these cameras. Some of my favorite pictures were taken with a Minolta X-570 and a 55/1.9 lens I fished out of a bin in a thrift store. It still works great, but it can’t hurt to have a backup now can it? My X-700 is as dead as a doorstop. Anyway, thanks for the great humor, we could all us a good belly laugh these days, yes? Keep up the good work.

Reply
C.J. Odenbach
11/30/2022 09:58:56 pm

Hi Jon. Glad to hear that you are enjoying the blog. And it never hurts to have a backup (or three or four ;-)). An X-570 and a X-370 make a great pair. I would love to score a 570/500 one of these days. I already have a backup or two just waiting for it ;-). Thanks for taking the time to comment and I hope we can continue to give you a reason to keep reading and laughing.

Best regards.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    C.J. Odenbach

    Suffers from a quarter-century and counting film and manual focus SLR addiction. Has recently expanded into 1980's AF point and shoots, and (gack!) '90s SLRs. He even mixes in some digital. Definitely a sick man.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Buyer's Guide
    Camera Comparison
    Camera Profiles
    Canon
    Contax/Yashica
    Film
    Filters
    Flash
    Fuji
    History
    Kodak
    Konica
    Leica
    Lenses
    Mamiya
    Minolta
    Nikon
    Olympus
    Pentax
    Point & Shoots
    Rangefinders
    SLRs
    Tips
    Topcon

    Archives

    December 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    June 2023
    March 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

​© COPYRIGHT 2016 - 2025. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Store
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • About
  • Policies